Red Hat Summit이 콘텐츠는 선택한 언어로 제공되지 않습니다.
10.2. Additional Configuration Considerations
In addition to the locking considerations, you should take the following into account when configuring an NFS service over a GFS or GFS2 file system.
- Red Hat supports only Red Hat Cluster Suite configurations using NFSv3 with locking in an active/passive configuration with the following characteristics:
- The backend file system is a GFS or GFS2 file system running on a 2 to 16 node cluster.
- An NFSv3 server is defined as a service exporting the entire GFS/GFS2 file system from a single cluster node at a time.
- The NFS server can fail over from one cluster node to another (active/passive configuration).
- No access to the GFS/GFS2 file system is allowed except through the NFS server. This includes both local GFS/GFS2 file system access as well as access through Samba or Clustered Samba.
- The GFS or GFS2 file system must be mounted with the
localflocksoption. - There is no NFS quota support on the system.
This configuration provides HA for the file system and reduces system downtime since a failed node does not result in the requirement to execute thefsckcommand when failing the NFS server from one node to another. - The
fsid=NFS option is mandatory for NFS exports of GFS/GFS2. - There is currently an issue with failover and failback when using NFSv3 over GFS with TCP when the following scenario comes into play:
- Client A mounts from server 1.
- The system administrator moves NFS service from server 1 to server 2.
- The client resumes I/O operations.
- The system administrator moves NFS service from server 2 to server 1.
In this situation, the NFS service on server 1 does not get shut down because this would render other NFS services inoperable.Should this situation arise, you should move all NFS services off of server 1 and run theservice nfs restart. After this you can safely migrate your NFS services back to server 1. - If problems arise with your cluster (for example, the cluster becomes inquorate and fencing is not successful), the clustered logical volumes and the GFS/GFS2 file system will be frozen and no access is possible until the cluster is quorate. You should consider this possibility when determining whether a simple failover solution such as the one defined in this procedure is the most appropriate for your system.
'%20d='M201.5%20305.5c-13.8%200-24.9-11.1-24.9-24.6%200-13.8%2011.1-24.9%2024.9-24.9%2013.6%200%2024.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.9%200%2013.6-11.1%2024.6-24.6%2024.6zM504%20256c0%20137-111%20248-248%20248S8%20393%208%20256%20119%208%20256%208s248%20111%20248%20248zm-132.3-41.2c-9.4%200-17.7%203.9-23.8%2010-22.4-15.5-52.6-25.5-86.1-26.6l17.4-78.3%2055.4%2012.5c0%2013.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.6%2024.6%2013.8%200%2024.9-11.3%2024.9-24.9s-11.1-24.9-24.9-24.9c-9.7%200-18%205.8-22.1%2013.8l-61.2-13.6c-3-.8-6.1%201.4-6.9%204.4l-19.1%2086.4c-33.2%201.4-63.1%2011.3-85.5%2026.8-6.1-6.4-14.7-10.2-24.1-10.2-34.9%200-46.3%2046.9-14.4%2062.8-1.1%205-1.7%2010.2-1.7%2015.5%200%2052.6%2059.2%2095.2%20132%2095.2%2073.1%200%20132.3-42.6%20132.3-95.2%200-5.3-.6-10.8-1.9-15.8%2031.3-16%2019.8-62.5-14.9-62.5zM302.8%20331c-18.2%2018.2-76.1%2017.9-93.6%200-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3%200-2.5%202.5-2.5%206.4%200%208.6%2022.8%2022.8%2087.3%2022.8%20110.2%200%202.5-2.2%202.5-6.1%200-8.6-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3%200zm7.7-75c-13.6%200-24.6%2011.1-24.6%2024.9%200%2013.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.6%2024.6%2013.8%200%2024.9-11.1%2024.9-24.6%200-13.8-11-24.9-24.9-24.9z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}