Este contenido no está disponible en el idioma seleccionado.
Chapter 8. Vault SPI
8.1. Vault provider
You can use a vault SPI from org.keycloak.vault package to write custom extension for Red Hat Single Sign-On to connect to arbitrary vault implementation.
The built-in files-plaintext provider is an example of the implementation of this SPI. In general the following rules apply:
-
To prevent a secret from leaking across realms, you may want to isolate or limit the secrets that can be retrieved by a realm. In that case, your provider should take into account the realm name when looking up secrets, for example by prefixing entries with the realm name. For example, an expression
${vault.key}would then evaluate generally to different entry names, depending on whether it was used in a realm A or realm B. To differentiate between realms, the realm needs to be passed to the createdVaultProviderinstance fromVaultProviderFactory.create()method where it is available from theKeycloakSessionparameter. -
The vault provider needs to implement a single method
obtainSecretthat returns aVaultRawSecretfor the given secret name. That class holds the representation of the secret either inbyte[]orByteBufferand is expected to convert between the two upon demand. Note that this buffer would be discarded after usage as explained below.
For details on how to package and deploy a custom provider refer to the Service Provider Interfaces chapter.
8.2. Consuming values from vault
The vault contains sensitive data and Red Hat Single Sign-On treats the secrets accordingly. When accessing a secret, the secret is obtained from the vault and retained in JVM memory only for the necessary time. Then all possible attempts to discard its content from JVM memory is done. This is achieved by using the vault secrets only within try-with-resources statement as outlined below:
char[] c;
try (VaultCharSecret cSecret = session.vault().getCharSecret(SECRET_NAME)) {
// ... use cSecret
c = cSecret.getAsArray().orElse(null);
// if c != null, it now contains password
}
// if c != null, it now contains garbage
The example uses KeycloakSession.vault() as the entrypoint for accessing the secrets. Using the VaultProvider.obtainSecret method directly is indeed also possible. However the vault() method has the benefit of ability to interpret the raw secret (which is generally a byte array) as a character array (via vault().getCharSecret()) or a String (via vault().getStringSecret()) in addition to obtaining the original uninterpreted value (via vault().getRawSecret() method).
Note that since String objects are immutable, their content cannot be discarded by overriding with random garbage. Even though measures have been taken in the default VaultStringSecret implementation to prevent internalizing Strings, the secrets stored in String objects would live at least to the next GC round. Thus using plain byte and character arrays and buffers is preferable.
