Red Hat SummitEste conteúdo não está disponível no idioma selecionado.
15.6.8. The Permission Authorization Model
Seam Security provides an extensible framework for resolving application permissions. The following class diagram shows an overview of the main components of the permission framework:
The relevant classes are explained in more detail in the following sections.
15.6.8.1. PermissionResolver
Copiar o linkLink copiado para a área de transferência!
An interface that provides methods for resolving individual object permissions. Seam provides the following built-in
PermissionResolver implementations, which are described in greater detail later in the chapter:
RuleBasedPermissionResolver— Resolves rule-based permission checks with Drools.PersistentPermissionResolver— Stores object permissions in a permanent store, such as a relational database.
15.6.8.1.1. Writing your own PermissionResolver
Copiar o linkLink copiado para a área de transferência!
Implementing your own permission resolver is simple. The
PermissionResolver interface defines two methods that must be implemented, as seen in the following table. If your PermissionResolver is deployed in your Seam project, it will be scanned automatically during deployment and registered with the default ResolverChain.
|
Return type
|
Method
|
Description
|
|---|---|---|
boolean
| hasPermission(Object target, String action)
|
This method resolves whether the currently authenticated user (obtained via a call to
Identity.getPrincipal()) has the permission specified by the target and action parameters. It returns true if the user has the specified permission, or false if they do not.
|
void
| filterSetByAction(Set<Object> targets, String action)
|
This method removes any objects from the specified set that would return
true if passed to the hasPermission() method with the same action parameter value.
|
Note
Because they are cached in the user's session, any custom
PermissionResolver implementations must adhere to several restrictions. Firstly, they cannot contain any state that is more fine-grained than the session scope, and the component itself should be either application- or session-scoped. Secondly, they must not use dependency injection, as they may be accessed from multiple threads simultaneously. For optimal performance, we recommend annotating with @BypassInterceptors to bypass Seam's interceptor stack altogether.
'%20d='M201.5%20305.5c-13.8%200-24.9-11.1-24.9-24.6%200-13.8%2011.1-24.9%2024.9-24.9%2013.6%200%2024.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.9%200%2013.6-11.1%2024.6-24.6%2024.6zM504%20256c0%20137-111%20248-248%20248S8%20393%208%20256%20119%208%20256%208s248%20111%20248%20248zm-132.3-41.2c-9.4%200-17.7%203.9-23.8%2010-22.4-15.5-52.6-25.5-86.1-26.6l17.4-78.3%2055.4%2012.5c0%2013.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.6%2024.6%2013.8%200%2024.9-11.3%2024.9-24.9s-11.1-24.9-24.9-24.9c-9.7%200-18%205.8-22.1%2013.8l-61.2-13.6c-3-.8-6.1%201.4-6.9%204.4l-19.1%2086.4c-33.2%201.4-63.1%2011.3-85.5%2026.8-6.1-6.4-14.7-10.2-24.1-10.2-34.9%200-46.3%2046.9-14.4%2062.8-1.1%205-1.7%2010.2-1.7%2015.5%200%2052.6%2059.2%2095.2%20132%2095.2%2073.1%200%20132.3-42.6%20132.3-95.2%200-5.3-.6-10.8-1.9-15.8%2031.3-16%2019.8-62.5-14.9-62.5zM302.8%20331c-18.2%2018.2-76.1%2017.9-93.6%200-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3%200-2.5%202.5-2.5%206.4%200%208.6%2022.8%2022.8%2087.3%2022.8%20110.2%200%202.5-2.2%202.5-6.1%200-8.6-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3%200zm7.7-75c-13.6%200-24.6%2011.1-24.6%2024.9%200%2013.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.6%2024.6%2013.8%200%2024.9-11.1%2024.9-24.6%200-13.8-11-24.9-24.9-24.9z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}