2.2. Differences between the sparse and dense index


UDS sparse and dense index types differ in memory usage, deduplication window coverage, and physical space requirements, affecting optimal workload selection strategies.

The UDS Sparse Indexing feature relies on the temporal locality of data and attempts to retain only the most relevant index entries in memory. With the sparse index, UDS can maintain a deduplication window that is ten times larger than with the dense index while using the same amount of memory. The sparse index requires ten times more physical space for metadata.

Although the sparse index provides the greatest coverage, the dense index provides more deduplication advice. For most workloads, given the same amount of memory, the difference in deduplication rates between dense and sparse indexes is negligible.

Red Hat logoGithubredditYoutubeTwitter

学习

尝试、购买和销售

社区

关于红帽文档

通过我们的产品和服务,以及可以信赖的内容,帮助红帽用户创新并实现他们的目标。 了解我们当前的更新.

让开源更具包容性

红帽致力于替换我们的代码、文档和 Web 属性中存在问题的语言。欲了解更多详情,请参阅红帽博客.

關於紅帽

我们提供强化的解决方案,使企业能够更轻松地跨平台和环境(从核心数据中心到网络边缘)工作。

Theme

© 2026 Red Hat
返回顶部