此内容没有您所选择的语言版本。

9.5.3. Replicated Caches With Only One Cache Having A Store


2 nodes but only one accesses the back end store

Figure 9.3. 2 nodes but only one accesses the back end store

This is a similar case to the previous one, but here only one node in the cluster interacts with a back end store via its cache loader. All other nodes perform in-memory replication. The idea here is all application state is kept in memory in each node, with the existence of multiple caches making the data highly available. (This assumes that a client that needs the data is able to somehow fail over from one cache to another.) The single persistent back end store then provides a backup copy of the data in case all caches in the cluster fail or need to be restarted.
Note that here it may make sense for the cache loader to store changes asynchronously, that is not on the caller's thread, in order not to slow down the cluster by accessing (for example) a database. This is a non-issue when using asynchronous replication.
A weakness with this architecture is that the cache with access to the cache loader becomes a single point of failure. Furthermore, if the cluster is restarted, the cache with the cache loader must be started first (easy to forget). A solution to the first problem is to configure a cache loader on each node, but set the singletonStore configuration to true. With this kind of setup, one but only one node will always be writing to a persistent store. However, this complicates the restart problem, as before restarting you need to determine which cache was writing before the shutdown/failure and then start that cache first.
Red Hat logoGithubredditYoutubeTwitter

学习

尝试、购买和销售

社区

关于红帽文档

通过我们的产品和服务,以及可以信赖的内容,帮助红帽用户创新并实现他们的目标。 了解我们当前的更新.

让开源更具包容性

红帽致力于替换我们的代码、文档和 Web 属性中存在问题的语言。欲了解更多详情,请参阅红帽博客.

關於紅帽

我们提供强化的解决方案,使企业能够更轻松地跨平台和环境(从核心数据中心到网络边缘)工作。

Theme

© 2026 Red Hat
返回顶部