Chapter 2. Admin network policy


2.1. OVN-Kubernetes AdminNetworkPolicy

2.1.1. AdminNetworkPolicy

An AdminNetworkPolicy (ANP) is a cluster-scoped custom resource definition (CRD). As a Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS administrator, you can use ANP to secure your network by creating network policies before creating namespaces. Additionally, you can create network policies on a cluster-scoped level that is non-overridable by NetworkPolicy objects.

The key difference between AdminNetworkPolicy and NetworkPolicy objects are that the former is for administrators and is cluster scoped while the latter is for tenant owners and is namespace scoped.

An ANP allows administrators to specify the following:

  • A priority value that determines the order of its evaluation. The lower the value the higher the precedence.
  • A set of pods that consists of a set of namespaces or namespace on which the policy is applied.
  • A list of ingress rules to be applied for all ingress traffic towards the subject.
  • A list of egress rules to be applied for all egress traffic from the subject.

2.1.1.1. AdminNetworkPolicy example

Example 2.1. Example YAML file for an ANP

apiVersion: policy.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: AdminNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: sample-anp-deny-pass-rules 
1

spec:
  priority: 50 
2

  subject:
    namespaces:
      matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: example.name 
3

  ingress: 
4

  - name: "deny-all-ingress-tenant-1" 
5

    action: "Deny"
    from:
    - pods:
        namespaceSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-anp: tenant-1
        podSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-anp: tenant-1 
6

  egress:
7

  - name: "pass-all-egress-to-tenant-1"
    action: "Pass"
    to:
    - pods:
        namespaceSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-anp: tenant-1
        podSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-anp: tenant-1
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap
1
Specify a name for your ANP.
2
The spec.priority field supports a maximum of 100 ANPs in the range of values 0-99 in a cluster. The lower the value, the higher the precedence because the range is read in order from the lowest to highest value. Because there is no guarantee which policy takes precedence when ANPs are created at the same priority, set ANPs at different priorities so that precedence is deliberate.
3
Specify the namespace to apply the ANP resource.
4
ANP have both ingress and egress rules. ANP rules for spec.ingress field accepts values of Pass, Deny, and Allow for the action field.
5
Specify a name for the ingress.name.
6
Specify podSelector.matchLabels to select pods within the namespaces selected by namespaceSelector.matchLabels as ingress peers.
7
ANPs have both ingress and egress rules. ANP rules for spec.egress field accepts values of Pass, Deny, and Allow for the action field.

Additional resources

2.1.1.2. AdminNetworkPolicy actions for rules

As an administrator, you can set Allow, Deny, or Pass as the action field for your AdminNetworkPolicy rules. Because OVN-Kubernetes uses a tiered ACLs to evaluate network traffic rules, ANP allow you to set very strong policy rules that can only be changed by an administrator modifying them, deleting the rule, or overriding them by setting a higher priority rule.

2.1.1.2.1. AdminNetworkPolicy Allow example

The following ANP that is defined at priority 9 ensures all ingress traffic is allowed from the monitoring namespace towards any tenant (all other namespaces) in the cluster.

Example 2.2. Example YAML file for a strong Allow ANP

apiVersion: policy.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: AdminNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: allow-monitoring
spec:
  priority: 9
  subject:
    namespaces: {} # Use the empty selector with caution because it also selects OpenShift namespaces as well.
  ingress:
  - name: "allow-ingress-from-monitoring"
    action: "Allow"
    from:
    - namespaces:
        matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: monitoring
# ...
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap

This is an example of a strong Allow ANP because it is non-overridable by all the parties involved. No tenants can block themselves from being monitored using NetworkPolicy objects and the monitoring tenant also has no say in what it can or cannot monitor.

2.1.1.2.2. AdminNetworkPolicy Deny example

The following ANP that is defined at priority 5 ensures all ingress traffic from the monitoring namespace is blocked towards restricted tenants (namespaces that have labels security: restricted).

Example 2.3. Example YAML file for a strong Deny ANP

apiVersion: policy.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: AdminNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: block-monitoring
spec:
  priority: 5
  subject:
    namespaces:
      matchLabels:
        security: restricted
  ingress:
  - name: "deny-ingress-from-monitoring"
    action: "Deny"
    from:
    - namespaces:
        matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: monitoring
# ...
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap

This is a strong Deny ANP that is non-overridable by all the parties involved. The restricted tenant owners cannot authorize themselves to allow monitoring traffic, and the infrastructure’s monitoring service cannot scrape anything from these sensitive namespaces.

When combined with the strong Allow example, the block-monitoring ANP has a lower priority value giving it higher precedence, which ensures restricted tenants are never monitored.

2.1.1.2.3. AdminNetworkPolicy Pass example

The following ANP that is defined at priority 7 ensures all ingress traffic from the monitoring namespace towards internal infrastructure tenants (namespaces that have labels security: internal) are passed on to tier 2 of the ACLs and evaluated by the namespaces’ NetworkPolicy objects.

Example 2.4. Example YAML file for a strong Pass ANP

apiVersion: policy.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: AdminNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: pass-monitoring
spec:
  priority: 7
  subject:
    namespaces:
      matchLabels:
        security: internal
  ingress:
  - name: "pass-ingress-from-monitoring"
    action: "Pass"
    from:
    - namespaces:
        matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: monitoring
# ...
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap

This example is a strong Pass action ANP because it delegates the decision to NetworkPolicy objects defined by tenant owners. This pass-monitoring ANP allows all tenant owners grouped at security level internal to choose if their metrics should be scraped by the infrastructures' monitoring service using namespace scoped NetworkPolicy objects.

2.2. OVN-Kubernetes BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy

2.2.1. BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy

BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy (BANP) is a cluster-scoped custom resource definition (CRD). As a Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS administrator, you can use BANP to setup and enforce optional baseline network policy rules that are overridable by users using NetworkPolicy objects if need be. Rule actions for BANP are allow or deny.

The BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy resource is a cluster singleton object that can be used as a guardrail policy incase a passed traffic policy does not match any NetworkPolicy objects in the cluster. A BANP can also be used as a default security model that provides guardrails that intra-cluster traffic is blocked by default and a user will need to use NetworkPolicy objects to allow known traffic. You must use default as the name when creating a BANP resource.

A BANP allows administrators to specify:

  • A subject that consists of a set of namespaces or namespace.
  • A list of ingress rules to be applied for all ingress traffic towards the subject.
  • A list of egress rules to be applied for all egress traffic from the subject.

2.2.1.1. BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy example

Example 2.5. Example YAML file for BANP

apiVersion: policy.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: default 
1

spec:
  subject:
    namespaces:
      matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: example.name 
2

  ingress: 
3

  - name: "deny-all-ingress-from-tenant-1" 
4

    action: "Deny"
    from:
    - pods:
        namespaceSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-banp: tenant-1 
5

        podSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-banp: tenant-1 
6

  egress:
  - name: "allow-all-egress-to-tenant-1"
    action: "Allow"
    to:
    - pods:
        namespaceSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-banp: tenant-1
        podSelector:
          matchLabels:
            custom-banp: tenant-1
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap
1
The policy name must be default because BANP is a singleton object.
2
Specify the namespace to apply the ANP to.
3
BANP have both ingress and egress rules. BANP rules for spec.ingress and spec.egress fields accepts values of Deny and Allow for the action field.
4
Specify a name for the ingress.name
5
Specify the namespaces to select the pods from to apply the BANP resource.
6
Specify podSelector.matchLabels name of the pods to apply the BANP resource.

2.2.1.2. BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy Deny example

The following BANP singleton ensures that the administrator has set up a default deny policy for all ingress monitoring traffic coming into the tenants at internal security level. When combined with the "AdminNetworkPolicy Pass example", this deny policy acts as a guardrail policy for all ingress traffic that is passed by the ANP pass-monitoring policy.

Example 2.6. Example YAML file for a guardrail Deny rule

apiVersion: policy.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: default
spec:
  subject:
    namespaces:
      matchLabels:
        security: internal
  ingress:
  - name: "deny-ingress-from-monitoring"
    action: "Deny"
    from:
    - namespaces:
        matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: monitoring
# ...
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap

You can use an AdminNetworkPolicy resource with a Pass value for the action field in conjunction with the BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy resource to create a multi-tenant policy. This multi-tenant policy allows one tenant to collect monitoring data on their application while simultaneously not collecting data from a second tenant.

As an administrator, if you apply both the "AdminNetworkPolicy Pass action example" and the "BaselineAdminNetwork Policy Deny example", tenants are then left with the ability to choose to create a NetworkPolicy resource that will be evaluated before the BANP.

For example, Tenant 1 can set up the following NetworkPolicy resource to monitor ingress traffic:

Example 2.7. Example NetworkPolicy

apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: allow-monitoring
  namespace: tenant 1
spec:
  podSelector:
  policyTypes:
    - Ingress
  ingress:
  - from:
    - namespaceSelector:
        matchLabels:
          kubernetes.io/metadata.name: monitoring
# ...
Copy to Clipboard Toggle word wrap

In this scenario, Tenant 1’s policy would be evaluated after the "AdminNetworkPolicy Pass action example" and before the "BaselineAdminNetwork Policy Deny example", which denies all ingress monitoring traffic coming into tenants with security level internal. With Tenant 1’s NetworkPolicy object in place, they will be able to collect data on their application. Tenant 2, however, who does not have any NetworkPolicy objects in place, will not be able to collect data. As an administrator, you have not by default monitored internal tenants, but instead, you created a BANP that allows tenants to use NetworkPolicy objects to override the default behavior of your BANP.

Back to top
Red Hat logoGithubredditYoutubeTwitter

Learn

Try, buy, & sell

Communities

About Red Hat Documentation

We help Red Hat users innovate and achieve their goals with our products and services with content they can trust. Explore our recent updates.

Making open source more inclusive

Red Hat is committed to replacing problematic language in our code, documentation, and web properties. For more details, see the Red Hat Blog.

About Red Hat

We deliver hardened solutions that make it easier for enterprises to work across platforms and environments, from the core datacenter to the network edge.

Theme

© 2025 Red Hat