红帽全球峰会18.8. Virtual machine performance monitoring tools
To identify what consumes the most VM resources and which aspect of VM performance needs optimization, performance diagnostic tools, both general and VM-specific, can be used.
Default OS performance monitoring tools
For standard performance evaluation, you can use the utilities provided by default by your host and guest operating systems:
On your RHEL 10 host, as root, use the
toputility or the system monitor application, and look forqemuandvirtin the output. This shows how much host system resources your VMs are consuming.-
If the monitoring tool displays that any of the
qemuorvirtprocesses consume a large portion of the host CPU or memory capacity, use theperfutility to investigate. For details, see below. -
In addition, if a
vhost_netthread process, named for example vhost_net-1234, is displayed as consuming an excessive amount of host CPU capacity, consider using virtual network optimization features, such asmulti-queue virtio-net.
-
If the monitoring tool displays that any of the
On the guest operating system, use performance utilities and applications available on the system to evaluate which processes consume the most system resources.
-
On Linux systems, you can use the
toputility. - On Windows systems, you can use the Task Manager application.
-
On Linux systems, you can use the
perf kvm
You can use the perf utility to collect and analyze virtualization-specific statistics about the performance of your RHEL 10 host. To do so:
On the host, install the perf package:
# dnf install perfUse one of the
perf kvm statcommands to display perf statistics for your virtualization host:-
For real-time monitoring of your hypervisor, use the
perf kvm stat livecommand. -
To log the perf data of your hypervisor over a period of time, activate the logging by using the
perf kvm stat recordcommand. After the command is canceled or interrupted, the data is saved in theperf.data.guestfile, which can be analyzed by using theperf kvm stat reportcommand.
-
For real-time monitoring of your hypervisor, use the
Analyze the
perfoutput for types ofVM-EXITevents and their distribution. For example, thePAUSE_INSTRUCTIONevents should be infrequent, but in the following output, the high occurrence of this event suggests that the host CPUs are not handling the running vCPUs well. In such a scenario, consider shutting down some of your active VMs, removing vCPUs from these VMs, or tuning the performance of the vCPUs.# perf kvm stat report Analyze events for all VMs, all VCPUs: VM-EXIT Samples Samples% Time% Min Time Max Time Avg time EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT 365634 31.59% 18.04% 0.42us 58780.59us 204.08us ( +- 0.99% ) MSR_WRITE 293428 25.35% 0.13% 0.59us 17873.02us 1.80us ( +- 4.63% ) PREEMPTION_TIMER 276162 23.86% 0.23% 0.51us 21396.03us 3.38us ( +- 5.19% ) PAUSE_INSTRUCTION 189375 16.36% 11.75% 0.72us 29655.25us 256.77us ( +- 0.70% ) HLT 20440 1.77% 69.83% 0.62us 79319.41us 14134.56us ( +- 0.79% ) VMCALL 12426 1.07% 0.03% 1.02us 5416.25us 8.77us ( +- 7.36% ) EXCEPTION_NMI 27 0.00% 0.00% 0.69us 1.34us 0.98us ( +- 3.50% ) EPT_MISCONFIG 5 0.00% 0.00% 5.15us 10.85us 7.88us ( +- 11.67% ) Total Samples:1157497, Total events handled time:413728274.66us.Other event types that can signal problems in the output of
perf kvm statinclude:-
INSN_EMULATION- suggests suboptimal VM I/O configuration.
-
For more information about using perf to monitor virtualization performance, see the perf-kvm(1) man page on your system.
numastat
To see the current NUMA configuration of your system, you can use the numastat utility, which is provided by installing the numactl package.
The following shows a host with 4 running VMs, each obtaining memory from multiple NUMA nodes. This is not optimal for vCPU performance, and warrants adjusting:
# numastat -c qemu-kvm
Per-node process memory usage (in MBs)
PID Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node 5 Node 6 Node 7 Total
--------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
51722 (qemu-kvm) 68 16 357 6936 2 3 147 598 8128
51747 (qemu-kvm) 245 11 5 18 5172 2532 1 92 8076
53736 (qemu-kvm) 62 432 1661 506 4851 136 22 445 8116
53773 (qemu-kvm) 1393 3 1 2 12 0 0 6702 8114
--------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total 1769 463 2024 7462 10037 2672 169 7837 32434In contrast, the following shows memory being provided to each VM by a single node, which is significantly more efficient.
# numastat -c qemu-kvm
Per-node process memory usage (in MBs)
PID Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node 5 Node 6 Node 7 Total
--------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
51747 (qemu-kvm) 0 0 7 0 8072 0 1 0 8080
53736 (qemu-kvm) 0 0 7 0 0 0 8113 0 8120
53773 (qemu-kvm) 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 8110 8118
59065 (qemu-kvm) 0 0 8050 0 0 0 0 0 8051
--------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total 0 0 8072 0 8072 0 8114 8110 32368
'%20d='M201.5%20305.5c-13.8%200-24.9-11.1-24.9-24.6%200-13.8%2011.1-24.9%2024.9-24.9%2013.6%200%2024.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.9%200%2013.6-11.1%2024.6-24.6%2024.6zM504%20256c0%20137-111%20248-248%20248S8%20393%208%20256%20119%208%20256%208s248%20111%20248%20248zm-132.3-41.2c-9.4%200-17.7%203.9-23.8%2010-22.4-15.5-52.6-25.5-86.1-26.6l17.4-78.3%2055.4%2012.5c0%2013.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.6%2024.6%2013.8%200%2024.9-11.3%2024.9-24.9s-11.1-24.9-24.9-24.9c-9.7%200-18%205.8-22.1%2013.8l-61.2-13.6c-3-.8-6.1%201.4-6.9%204.4l-19.1%2086.4c-33.2%201.4-63.1%2011.3-85.5%2026.8-6.1-6.4-14.7-10.2-24.1-10.2-34.9%200-46.3%2046.9-14.4%2062.8-1.1%205-1.7%2010.2-1.7%2015.5%200%2052.6%2059.2%2095.2%20132%2095.2%2073.1%200%20132.3-42.6%20132.3-95.2%200-5.3-.6-10.8-1.9-15.8%2031.3-16%2019.8-62.5-14.9-62.5zM302.8%20331c-18.2%2018.2-76.1%2017.9-93.6%200-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3%200-2.5%202.5-2.5%206.4%200%208.6%2022.8%2022.8%2087.3%2022.8%20110.2%200%202.5-2.2%202.5-6.1%200-8.6-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3%200zm7.7-75c-13.6%200-24.6%2011.1-24.6%2024.9%200%2013.6%2011.1%2024.6%2024.6%2024.6%2013.8%200%2024.9-11.1%2024.9-24.6%200-13.8-11-24.9-24.9-24.9z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}